<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"  
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  
	>  
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TikZ: chains with labeled edges</title>
	<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/</link>
	<description>Typography with TeX and LaTeX</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing all this interesting stuff. I'm loving this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing all this interesting stuff. I&#8217;m loving this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Kottwitz</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Kottwitz</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Hi Markus,

thank you for the tipp! I've corrected it above. I have compiled your sequence in order to see it and further to post it here as well:
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;img src='http://texblog.net/png/long-exact-sequence.png' width="371" height="119" class='wp-smiley' alt='Long exact sequence' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Markus,</p>
<p>thank you for the tipp! I&#8217;ve corrected it above. I have compiled your sequence in order to see it and further to post it here as well:</p>
<div align="center"><img src='http://texblog.net/png/long-exact-sequence.png' width="371" height="119" class='wp-smiley' alt='Long exact sequence' /></div>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Upmeier</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Upmeier</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan!
I believe your sequence is actually short exact. A quite acceptable long exact sequence (in homology with boundary homomorphisms) may be achieved by

$\xymatrix{H_k(C_*)\ar[r]^{H_k(i_*)}&#38; H_k(D_*)\ar[r]^{H_k(q_*)} &#38; H_k(E_*) \ar @{-&#62;} `r/8pt[d] `/10pt[l]^\partial `^dl[ll] `^r/3pt[dll] [dll] \\ H_{k-1}(C_*)\ar[r]\ar[r]^{H_{k-1}(i_*)} &#38; H_{k-1}(D_*)\ar[r]^{H_{k-1}(q_*)} &#38; H_{k-1}(E_*)} $

Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan!<br />
I believe your sequence is actually short exact. A quite acceptable long exact sequence (in homology with boundary homomorphisms) may be achieved by</p>
<p>$\xymatrix{H_k(C_*)\ar[r]^{H_k(i_*)}&amp; H_k(D_*)\ar[r]^{H_k(q_*)} &amp; H_k(E_*) \ar @{-&gt;} `r/8pt[d] `/10pt[l]^\partial `^dl[ll] `^r/3pt[dll] [dll] \\ H_{k-1}(C_*)\ar[r]\ar[r]^{H_{k-1}(i_*)} &amp; H_{k-1}(D_*)\ar[r]^{H_{k-1}(q_*)} &amp; H_{k-1}(E_*)} $</p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Pedrosa</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Pedrosa</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan,

I really appreciated your post. However need to have access to the options field of the edge command, e.g., for changing the style of my arrow tips. What I discovered is that this has a very simple solution. I just had to change the key handler /.code to the key handler /.code 2 args, that supports two arguments:

\tikzset{join/.code 2 arg=\tikzset{after node path={%
\ifx\tikzchainprevious\pgfutil@empty\else(\tikzchainprevious)%
edge[#1]#2(\tikzchaincurrent)\fi}}}

The first argument are the edge options and the second argument is the node command, corresponding to the sintax join={edge options}{node[options] {label}}.

Pedro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan,</p>
<p>I really appreciated your post. However need to have access to the options field of the edge command, e.g., for changing the style of my arrow tips. What I discovered is that this has a very simple solution. I just had to change the key handler /.code to the key handler /.code 2 args, that supports two arguments:</p>
<p>\tikzset{join/.code 2 arg=\tikzset{after node path={%<br />
\ifx\tikzchainprevious\pgfutil@empty\else(\tikzchainprevious)%<br />
edge[#1]#2(\tikzchaincurrent)\fi}}}</p>
<p>The first argument are the edge options and the second argument is the node command, corresponding to the sintax join={edge options}{node[options] {label}}.</p>
<p>Pedro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Kottwitz</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Kottwitz</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Hi vargonis,

you could put the tikzpicture environment into an equation environment to get it numbered. Perhaps consider modifying the baseline of the tikz picture to position the equation tag at the center like
&lt;pre lang="LaTeX"&gt;
\begin{equation}
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current
    bounding box.center)]
...
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{equation}
&lt;/pre&gt;

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi vargonis,</p>
<p>you could put the tikzpicture environment into an equation environment to get it numbered. Perhaps consider modifying the baseline of the tikz picture to position the equation tag at the center like</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><div class="code"><pre class="latex"><span style="color: #800000; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #F00000; font-weight: normal;">\begin</span></span>{<span style="color: #2222D0; font-weight: normal;">equation</span>}<span style="color: #00A000; font-weight: bold;">
<span style="color: #800000; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #F00000; font-weight: normal;">\begin</span></span>{<span style="color: #2222D0; font-weight: normal;">tikzpicture</span>}[baseline=(current
    bounding box.center)]
...
<span style="color: #800000; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #F00000; font-weight: normal;">\end</span></span>{<span style="color: #2222D0; font-weight: normal;">tikzpicture</span>}
</span><span style="color: #800000; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #F00000; font-weight: normal;">\end</span></span>{<span style="color: #2222D0; font-weight: normal;">equation</span>}</pre></div></div>

<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vargonis</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>vargonis</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>How would one do to number the diagram as if it was an equation, for later reference? I'm convinced by Tikz flexibility and output, but without that it's almost useless :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would one do to number the diagram as if it was an equation, for later reference? I&#8217;m convinced by Tikz flexibility and output, but without that it&#8217;s almost useless <img src='http://texblog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EQ</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>EQ</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Thanks! thats what i need :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! thats what i need <img src='http://texblog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex DuBois</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex DuBois</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Have you seen dot2texi yet? I don't think it is really for doing what your talking about; though I've only been using it a couple of weeks, so I could be wrong. Anyway, I use it for some graphing and thought you or another reader might find it useful.

http://www.fauskes.net/nb/introducing-dot2texi

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen dot2texi yet? I don&#8217;t think it is really for doing what your talking about; though I&#8217;ve only been using it a couple of weeks, so I could be wrong. Anyway, I use it for some graphing and thought you or another reader might find it useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fauskes.net/nb/introducing-dot2texi" rel="nofollow">http://www.fauskes.net/nb/introducing-dot2texi</a></p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Kottwitz</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Kottwitz</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Thiago,

thank you for posting your comment. I've written above why I'm using TikZ instead of xymatrix/xypic. I've used xypic earlier, it's a great tool and still recommendable. There could be advantages using a general purpose tool like TikZ, for instance if you want to combine it with other features, like overlays within a beamer presentation.
If just diagrams are considered xypic would be enough. My posting above is aimed at TikZ users, discussing production of diagrams without having to learn the xypic syntax.

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thiago,</p>
<p>thank you for posting your comment. I&#8217;ve written above why I&#8217;m using TikZ instead of xymatrix/xypic. I&#8217;ve used xypic earlier, it&#8217;s a great tool and still recommendable. There could be advantages using a general purpose tool like TikZ, for instance if you want to combine it with other features, like overlays within a beamer presentation.<br />
If just diagrams are considered xypic would be enough. My posting above is aimed at TikZ users, discussing production of diagrams without having to learn the xypic syntax.</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago</title>
		<link>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago</dc:creator> 
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://texblog.net/latex-archive/maths/pgf-tikz-commutative-diagram/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>if you are a mathematician you would use xymatrix to produce diagrams. It is easier and the code is shorter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you are a mathematician you would use xymatrix to produce diagrams. It is easier and the code is shorter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
